Wednesday 14 December 2016

The Southern Times

Disobedience and African Renaissance

Disobedience and African Renaissance
By Mkhosana Mathobela Bingweni
AFRICA finds itself today in a world that is engulfed in rapid climate change that is accompanied by a global warming that threatens the planet and humanity.
Anumber of dangers and conditions define the present economic and political dilemma of the world that Africa is hostage to.
The global economic meltdown occasions cruel financial crises that punish the majority poor and expand the social inequalities among the have and the have-nots of the world, the multiplicity of whom are Africans. Terrorism and the war against it have created an enveloping global climate of fear and risk that have made security, peace and happiness scarce resources. In recent history, Africans are appearing in the world as victims of terrorism or accused of being terrorists. The world has never been such an unsafe, insecure and unhappy place for humanity and nature itself.
The present political and economic condition of the world has been described as an order of coloniality of power. In this coloniality of power, man’s appetite for economic power, military might marked by a monopoly of nuclear weapons, greedy industrialisation that exhausts nature and the manipulation of knowledge and technology have turned around to threaten nature and humanity, and to put the planet itself at the risk of sudden collapse. This world order of danger, fear and permanent risk is not a natural phenomenon but a manmade disaster that has been unfolded by a capitalist world system and civilisation.
Philosophers of the Global South such as Arturo Escobar, Aime Cesaire and others have described this as a civilisation of death, where Europe has created modern problems of the world for which it has no modern solutions. Europe and America have created for the world and humanity stubborn and strong questions for which they have no stubborn and strong answers. What are simplistically called African political, economic and social problems today are in actuality world problems that Europe and America have through coloniality of power created and forced upon the world.
Africa and the Global South can only get out of this world order by a radical kind of awakening and insurrection that has popularly been called the African Renaissance, a systemic economic, political, cultural and spiritual revival. It is only through a radical African Renaissance and awakening that Africa can recover itself from its sorry position as a victim in the world.
World Rhetoric and African Logic
Europe and America have not only conquered and controlled the world through nuclear arsenal, the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) and other large scale instruments of pain and death. The Euro-American world system has indeed created and controlled the present world order partly by the use of military might and technological prowess. However, besides mighty force and the threats of it, the Euro-American world system has ordered and disordered the world using massive seduction and persuasion, bewitching promises and tantalising pies in the sky. Such persuasive and paradisal rhetorical representations of the European Renaissance and the Enlightenment intellectual movement were part of the mythical seductions that were circulated about Europe. Presenting Europe and America as the birth places of civilisation and progress has been the big lie of the centuries. From the 12th century to the 14th Century right up to the 17TH Century Europe claimed an awakening and an explosion of development and progress in the arts and the sciences, and the lives of the people. Intellectually, in ideas of progress and advancement, from 1715 to 1789, European historians circulated the rhetoric of Enlightenment, the light of art, science and wisdom that is supposed to have illuminated the planet with brightness and a dawn.
However, if truth be told, what was a Renaissance and Enlightenment in Europe was a rhetoric whose logic in the Global South was enslavement, colonisation, conquest, displacement of peoples to the plantations of America and Europe and dispossession of colonised peoples of their dignity, lands and other resources. As a result, philosophers of the Global South such as Walter Mignolo, Enrique Dussel and the many philosophers of liberation in Africa, most of whom became leaders of liberation movements, noticed a darker side of the Renaissance and an underside of the enlightenment.
The Euro-American world system works through beautiful rhetoric and painful logic, monopolising success and pleasure in Europe and America while spreading pain, poverty and death in the Global South. The languages of democracy, development, human rights and civilisation are all Euro-American rhetoric that conceals the cruel hidden economic and political agendas that Europe and America continue to visit upon the Global South. The global media and globalised Eurocentric education system have become gigantic international cultural industries that circulate Euro-American rhetoric of a coming paradise while effectively concealing the hell that Empire is turning the planet into, much faster than we observe and imagine. The Bretton Woods institutions, the IMF and the World Bank, have become financial prefects of the world that have maintained a global Washington Consensus monetary regime that has disciplined the Global South into conformity with and obedience to the Euro-American world system and its colonial and imperial orders.
African Renaissance
Thabo Mbeki was criticised for championing an African Renaissance, a philosophical and political idea that borrowed its name from the very European idea that gave birth to the enslavement and colonisation of Africa and the Global South for the benefit of Europe and America. Logically, and as explained by Thabo Mbeki himself, an Africa Renaissance must be a radically different idea, emphatically removed and opposed to the ideas of Europe and America, because a problem cannot be solved by simply using the logic that created it in the first place.
Earlier before Thabo Mbeki in 1906, another South African, Pixley Seme wrote a compelling essay and speech, calling for the “regeneration of Africa” and a political, economic, cultural and spiritual awakening of the continent. In 1937, a Nigerian philosopher of liberation and leader of the liberation movement, Nnamdi Azikiwe, published a forcefully argued book, Renascent Africa, making a clarion call for an African awakening and a revival of the continent from its painful underdevelopment, cultural death and economic impoverishment by imperialism and cultural colonisation.
Ngugi wa Thiongo, Chinweizu, Steve Biko and a multiplicity of other African thinkers were to follow up with their own ideas of the decolonisation and revival of black Africa, ideationally, economically and politically. In short, the idea of the African Renaissance, awakening or revival is one of the most powerfully imagined and argued ideas in the academy of the Global South.
The long and taxing struggles for the decolonisation and liberation of Africa from colonial direct rule were in a strong way struggles for the renaissance and awakening of Africa. More than 50 years after the first African country was decolonised, and two decades after the end of administrative apartheid in South Africa coloniality of power still has Africa in its grip of the many handed octopus. Many African states are categorised as failed states and basket cases where hopelessness has become permanence. Poverty, social inequality, disease and ignorance continue to define the lives of the majority of black people.
How possible it is to use European and American ideas of economic and political development to revive Africa is a question that must be asked. Otherwise, an African Renaissance entails disobedience to the political and economic prescriptions of the same world system that got Africa in this present political, economic and even spiritual and cultural dilemma. This disobedience to American and European knowledge and prescriptions has been called in many names such as “delinking” and “non-alignment.”
The 1955 conference of the countries of the Non-Aligned Movement in Bandung, Malaysia, was about countries of the Global South being suspicious and wary of political and economic influences of western and eastern Europe and America. Imposed and given economic and political ideas keep the continent dancing in circles of poverty and misery and being judged down by those who impoverished it in the first place.
Playing the political and economic game using the rules and standards of the enslaver and the coloniser may not be the best way to make an African Renaissance feasible.

The Southern Times

Pan Africanism is the road to Africa’s security

Pan Africanism is the road to Africa’s security
By Dr Motsoko Pheko
Pan Africanism is anti-nobody. It is pro-Africa. The mammoth task of liberating Africa from the ongoing imperialist exploitation and marginalisation can be achieved only through Pan-African unity. African people must understand that they have a common destiny.
Africa is a beautiful house that has been burning for some time with its children, women and men trapped inside. They are desperately trying to come out. As that Pan Africanist Dr Nnamdi Azikiwe correctly put it, “This Continent [Africa], has had the bad luck to be over-run by [European] soldiers of fortune that had neither [moral] fibre nor humanity. Slavery played its shameful role in depopulating Africa. Capitalism denuded [Africa] of its wealth. Colonialism deprived Africa of its birthright, and imperialism emasculated its will to live as human being and enjoy its share of bounties of the earth.”
Africans must control their riches for their people
Africa has immense wealth and resources. There is hardly an agricultural crop that cannot be produced on this great continent. And almost every kind of mineral is found in Africa – vanadium, chrome, uranium, cobalt, tantalum, platinum, gold, diamonds, iron, coal, oil, etc. Africa is blessed with three types of climate: temperate, tropical and Mediterranean.
The paradox is that its African owners are among the poorest people in the world. Africa is actually the size of Europe, America, China and India combined. The Democratic Republic of Congo alone is the size of the following twelve European countries combined: Britain, Ireland, France, Netherlands, Denmark, Germany, Portugal, Spain, Switzerland, Armenia, Albania and Belgium. Congo is 905,355 square miles. Its untapped potential wealth is estimated at twenty four trillion American dollars. This is equivalent to the Gross Domestic Product of Europe and America put together.
Imperialist countries have made Africa their hunting and looting ground for many years through various forms such as slavery, colonialism and neo-colonialism. Congo became a Belgian colony as a result of the imperialist Berlin General Act of 26 February 1885 through which seven Western European countries stole the whole of Africa, except for Ethiopia.
Boasting about how Belgium stole the riches of the Congo, the Belgian Secretary of Colonies Godding said, “During the War [European World War against Adolf Hitler], the Congo was able to finance all the expenditure of the Belgian government in exile in London, including the diplomatic service as well as the cost of armed forces in Europe and America…the Belgian gold reserve could be left intact.”
To get all these riches from the Congo, how did the Belgian colonialists treat Africans in their own country? The British philosopher Betrand Russell reported about the European colonial treatment of the Congolese Africans under their Belgian colonial rulers. He has written:
“Each village was ordered by [the colonial] authorities to collect and bring a certain amount of rubber as much as the men could bring by neglecting all work for their maintenance. If they failed to bring the required amount, their women were taken away and kept as hostages in the harems of government employees. If this method failed, troops were sent to the village to spread terror, if necessary by killing some of the men. They were ordered to bring one right hand amputated from an African victim for every cartridge used.” (Freedom And Organisation, 1814-1914)
The result of these atrocities, according to Sir Harris HH Johnston, was reduction of the African population in the Congo from 20 million to 9 million in 15 years.
Africans have given more than they have received
Imperialist countries have psychologically conditioned Africans to think that they cannot live without the crumbs from Europe or America or from any other imperialist country in this world. But the American Senator Jesse Helms during Ronald Reagan’s presidency let the cat out of the bag when he warned the Americans about the loss of wealth in South Africa if a Pan-Africanist government came to power.
“South Africa is the source of over 80 percent American mineral supply and 86 percent of platinum resources,” he said. “I will not go into details of each vital mineral. It was former Secretary of State Alexander Haig who said the loss of mineral output of South Africa could bring severest consequences to the existing economic and security framework of the free world. South Africa has 90 percent of the world’s chrome reserve. As you know there is no substitute for chrome in our military and industrial manufacturing.
“Without South Africa’s chrome, no engines for modern jet aircraft, cruise missiles or armaments could be built. The US air force could be grounded. Our military would be unarmed. Without South Africa’s chrome surgical equipment and utensils could not be produced. Our hospitals and doctors would be helpless.”
Imperialist countries have not only behaved as if Africa’s riches belong to them; they further have made Africans believe that they cannot do anything for themselves unless they totally depend on Western countries – in particular their former enslavers and colonisers. African leaders must exorcise this demon of helplessness and inferiority complex. This borders on idolatry where Africans worship the false gods of “superiority and invincibility”.
The Pan-African path leads to life but is no dinner party
The mammoth task of liberating Africa economically and technologically can be brought about only through Pan-African unity in a united Africa. Africans are the only people in the world who fight their common liberation struggles as individuals. Those who enslaved Africa and colonised Africa, however, have always united to achieve their imperialist goals. During the Berlin Conference when they stole the whole of Africa except Ethiopia, they sat at this Conference from 15 November 1884 to 26 February 1885. They were serious. They were united. They were determined. They wanted to steal all of Africa at gunpoint. Ethiopia was saved only by its glorious Victory of the Battle of Adwa against the Italian colonial invaders of Africa. This was on 1 March 1886. Pan Africanism is anti-nobody. It is pro-Africa. It is anti-injustice and continued stealing of Africa’s resources by some foreigners while the children of Africa wallow in the quagmire of poverty, ignorance, short life expectancy and high child mortality.
This creates a situation where Africans are incapable of educating their children for various technical skills and professions so that they can manage their national affairs competently. In a situation like this, Africans become victims of some foreign countries that see ignorant and poor Africans as their ready carcass to devour.
Africa needs the world and the world needs Africa
The world needs Africa and Africa needs the world. Pan-Africanists demand that there must be a new way of interacting with Africa economically and technologically. Africa needs a new breed of foreign investors who see Africa not just as a place to make quick riches, but as an important partner for the continent’s economic development and true liberation of the African people. Investors must get their fair share of profits. But the exploitative relation between investors and Africa must go. It must be buried deep in the colonial grave.
Over 50 years ago the late Kwame Nkrumah of Ghana hit the nail on the head when for his country, he declared: “We welcome foreign investors in a spirit of partnership. They can earn their profits here provided they leave us an agreed portion, promoting the welfare and happiness of our people as a whole, as against greedy ambitions of the few. From what we get out of this partnership we hope to expand the health services of our people, to feed and house all, to give them more and better educational institutions and see to it that they have a rising standard of living.”
Billions of dollars stolen from Africa 
Global Financial Integrity has researched and revealed that a cumulative sum of US$814.9 billion was swindled from Africa between 2004 and 2013. All African countries have lost large sums of money generated through corruption such as invasion of tax, bribes and cross-border smuggling.
A few examples are: South Africa US$209 billion, Nigeria US$178 billion, Tanzania US$191.77 billion, Senegal US$8.03 billion, Uganda US$116.76 billion, Tunisia US$154.5 billion, Egypt US$39.83 billion, Ethiopia US$25.83, billion, Lesotho US$3.41 billion, Swaziland US$5.82 billion, Botswana US$13.68 billion, Mauritius US$6.09 billion. African countries such as Guinea, Liberia and Mali which not long ago experienced thousands of deaths of their citizens due to the decimating Ebola disease, were also robbed of billions of dollars.
Other research institutions on this illicit flow of money out of Africa such as Christian Aid and Tax Justice Network have quantified the illicit flow of money out of Africa as between US$1.2 trillion and US$1.4 trillion. This is said to be four times the size of “Africa’s foreign debt.”     
The only African country from which there has been no money to steal is Somalia. This is a country that was long destabilised by America until October 1993. The American government withdrew from Somalia only after the Battle of Mogadishu in which 18 American soldiers were killed, 84 wounded, two Hawk helicopters downed by Somali army, three pilots killed and one pilot missing.
The then American President Bill Clinton called this, the “Battle of Rangers” or the “Black Hawk Down.”  When withdrawing the America troops from Somalia, he said, “We had gotten to a point where we kind of thought that we could intervene without getting hurt, without our soldiers getting killed. The incident I call ‘Black Hawk Down’ certainly disabused us of that.” Unfortunately this American mess has badly destroyed Somalia and distabilised East Africa to this day.
Western economic exploitation of Africa goes on unabated. In July 2008 Pope Benedict XVI could not contain himself about this any longer. His Holiness said, “Our Western way of life has stripped Africa’s people of their riches and continues to strip them.”
Corroborating this fact, a Member of the Scottish Parliament Mark Ballad affirmed, “Our [Western European] relationship to Africa is an exploitative one. The West no longer needs standing armies in Africa to strip its resources because it can do so more effectively with multi-national companies.”
Afrophobia undermines Pan-African unity
Let me move to another point that urgently needs the attention of all Pan-Africanists and leaders of the African Union. In some African countries there have been instances of Afrophobia. This is mistakenly called Xenophobia. The English borrowed this word from Greek. It means “fearing or hating a foreigner.”
But in reality this is Afrophobia. It means African brother hating African brother and sister and African sister hating African sister and brother. In the espoused spirit of Botho/UBuntu and Pan-Africanism, there is no African who can be a foreigner in Africa, while non-Africans who live in Africa are not regarded as foreigners. It is a contradiction in terms, to be an African and a “foreigner” at the same time.
On 22 May 2008, I spoke about Afrophobia as a Member in the South African Parliament. I pointed out that “African people have a common destiny. We are in the same ship. If it sails safely across the stormy seas we shall all be safe. If it sinks, we shall all perish. Europe enslaved or colonised us to accumulate their stolen riches from Africa. They did not care whether you were a Nigerian, a Zimbabwean, Azanian, South African or Mozambican. They inflicted their atrocities and genocide on every African whether in Jamaica or America.”
African Union desk at points of entry
One of the beginning steps member states of the African Union must take is to erect sign boards at all ports of entry in Africa for citizens of African states reading,   “ CITIZENS OF AFRICAN UNION.” These citizens must not be checked at the desk marked “FOREIGN PASSPORTS HERE.” This undermines the Pan-African agenda. Africans travelling within Africa must feel welcome in every African country.
Africa Liberation Day so declared in Addis Ababa by African heads of state on 25 May 1963 did not come cheap. Much African blood and tears were shed. It is a shame that many African countries that claim to work for African unity have still not declared May 25 a statutory holiday. It must be a special day on which all Africans reflect about where post-colonial Africa has come from, where Africa is presently and where Africa must be tomorrow; in terms of economic prosperity, progress, security of life and high living standard of Africa’s people; especially with regard to economic control of resources for African people and technological advancement in every sphere of life.   Africa is the epicentre of this planet. She has impeccable credentials to occupy a prominent place in the world as she did before she became the victim of the European Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade and colonialism. The 54 member states of the African Union are like rooms in one house. When one catches fire, the fire is likely to spread threatening the safety and security of the whole house. Pan-Africanism is not wishful thinking. It is Africa’s weapon to survive the onslaughts of imperialism. Not a single African country can stand on its own without perishing. Pan-African unity is not a choice. It is an imperative.
There is a subtle imperialist assault on Africa. In June 2016 three American credit rating agencies threatened to give South Africa a “junk status.” Their names are Standard & Poor, Fitch and Moody. They threatened to do the same to Nigeria in 2015.  If Africans do not wake up they will find their sovereign power that was paid with blood and tears lost to the greedy forces of this world. These greedy forces that have no moral fibre, humanity or a sense of justice have a clear a political agenda to recolonise African people and continue to under-develop Africa. That is why they have a new programme for Africa – “junk status.”
Pan Africanists must look seriously at the Western conspiracy of reducing African States to what they call “junk status.” These agencies are very powerful in the world of finance. They have the support of the American government. To prevent new companies that are not approved by the America government from offering similar credit rating services, new terms were put in place called “recognised rating manuals.” They protect and assist only the “Big Three” rating agencies against non-approved companies.
This June 2016, the move by the three American credit rating agencies has been followed by the arrogance of the American ambassador in Pretoria. He has warned of pending “terrorist attack in South Africa” in the media without first bringing this to the attention of the South African government. He ignored prescribed diplomatic channels. He behaved as if Azania (South Africa) is a colony of America. The South African government has refuted these claims as unfounded. Will some desperate forces anxious to prove their falsehood true, now “manufacture these terrorists” to “prove” that they were right? Whatever the case may finally be, this is a wakeup call to Africans to grow to manhood and womanhood and look after their own interests. This can be done successfully and effectively through Pan-African unity only.    
Unity will lead to victory for Africa
The struggle to return Africa to her power politically, economically and technologically is of course not a dinner party or a bed of roses. The enemies of Africa are determined to keep Africa and Africans weak, especially economically, technologically and militarily. Africa, however, has already overcome worse tragedies in her history: the slave trade, colonialism, racism, genocide and the longest holocaust in this world.
The colonial history of Africa demonstrates that when Africa is united on her objectives, goals and aims there has always been resounding achievement and victory for the African people. Where would Africa be today, if there had never been the 5th Pan African Congress in 1945, to plan the destruction of European colonial rule over Africans?
What would be the situation in Africa today, especially with regard to Angola, Mozambique, Namibia, Zimbabwe and apartheid colonial South Africa if there was never the Organisation of African Unity Liberation Committee to assist liberation movements such as the Pan Africanist Congress of Azania, the African National Congress, MPLA, FRELIMO,SWAPO, ZANU, ZAPU and PAIGC? The latter was led in Guinea Bissau and Cape Verde by that brilliant Pan-Africanist Amilcar Cabral.
The past generations of Africa suffered and survived the most barbaric forms of Western slavery and colonialism. Through their matchless resilience driven by sacrifice, selflessness and dedicated service, these older generations paved the way for Africa’s ultimate victory for the total and authentic emancipation of this continent. There are signs that victory is coming to Africa despite the current dark clouds. But this is only if Africa persists on the Pan-African path and chooses her friends carefully. There are wars no nuclear weapons can win.
How would the African liberation struggle against colonialism have progressed if on 6th March 1957, Ghana’s Kwame Nkrumah established diplomatic relations with South Africa, instead of declaring as he did, that “Ghana’s independence is meaningless unless it is linked to the total liberation of Africa?”
PAC got South Africa expelled UN
The Pan Africanist Congress of Azania (PAC) got South Africa expelled from the United Nations General Assembly. This was made possible because of the Pan African unity of the Organisation of Africa Unity – the predecessor of the African Union.
Commenting on this important victory for PAC and Africa, Prof. Tom Lodge has written, “In November 1974 the Pan Africanist Congress succeeded in obtaining the expulsion of South Africa from the United General Assembly and in July 1975 the Organisation of African Unity adopted as official policy a long document prepared by the PAC arguing for the illegality of South Africa’s status.”
That is how the PAC got the observer status at the United Nations. The ANC also benefited from this victory of the Pan Africanist Congress of Azania and the Organisation of African Unity.   
Indeed, the political situation in Africa today is such that even those among some African leaders who once opposed Pan Africanism and denigrated Pan Africanists as “racists” and “anti-white” are today forced by present circumstances to act Pan Africanly or pretend to do so.
Mwalimu Julius Nyerere, the first President of Tanzania, was right when he said, “There is no time to waste. We must unite or perish. Political independence is only a prelude to a new and more involved struggle….” Nyerere warned that “African nationalism is meaningless, dangerous and anachronistic, if it is not at the same time Pan Africanism.”
To advance victoriously to rebuilding the broken walls of Africa, Pan Africanism is the key and the most powerful weapon. Carefully planned action and vigilance are urgent in this age. Imperialism is overthrowing many governments it does not like. This has caused unprecedented terrorism in the world. It is now threatening even governments in Africa.
That Pan Africanist visionary Kwame Nkrumah was right when he warned: “If we [African people] are to remain free, if we are to enjoy the full benefits of Africa’s resources we must be united to plan our total defence and full exploitation of our material and human means in the full interest of all our people. To go it alone will limit our expectations and threaten our liberty.”                                        
*Dr Motsoko Pheko deliverd this message of solidarity to the world-wide Pan African Convention held at Orlando, SOWETO, Azania 13 -15 June 2016. He is author of several books such as “Africa In The Next 50 Years” and “How Africa Can Regain Her Lost Power and Glory” and is a former member of the South African parliament.

The Southern Times

African, African-American Inventors You should know: Part 1


Frederick McKinley Jones (1893-1961) was one of the most prolific Black inventors ever.  
Frederick Jones patented more than 60 inventions, however, he is best known for inventing an automatic refrigeration system for long-haul trucks in 1935 (a roof-mounted cooling device). Jones was the first person to invent a practical, mechanical refrigeration system for trucks and railroad cars, which eliminated the risk of food spoilage during long-distance shipping trips. 
The system was, in turn, adapted to a variety of other common carriers, including ships. Frederick Jones was issued the patent on July 12, 1940.
Sameera Moussa (1917-1952) was an Egyptian nuclear scientist who held a doctorate in atomic radiation and worked to make the medical use of nuclear technology affordable to all. 
She organised the Atomic Energy for Peace Conference and sponsored a call for setting an international conference under the banner “Atoms for Peace”.
Moussa believed in “Atoms for Peace” and said “I’ll make nuclear treatment as available and as cheap as Aspirin”. She worked hard for this purpose and throughout her intensive research, she came up with a historic equation that would help break the atoms of cheap metals such as copper, paving the way for a cheap nuclear bomb.
She organised the Atomic Energy for Peace Conference and sponsored a call for setting an international conference under the banner “Atom for Peace”, where many prominent scientists were invited. 
The conference made a number of recommendations for setting up a committee to protect against nuclear hazards, for which she strongly advocated. 
Moussa also volunteered to help treat cancer patients at various hospitals especially since her mother went through a fierce battle against this disease.
Seyi Oyesola is a Nigerian doctor, who co-invented “hospital in a box”.
Fed up with hospitals that were always short in supplies and prone to outages, Dr Oyesola co-invented hospital in a box, a mini hospital run with solar energy or off grid and completely mobile.
Physicist George Edward Alcorn, Jr (born 1940) is best known for his development of the imaging X-ray spectrometer. An X-ray spectrometer assists scientists in identifying a material by producing an X-ray spectrum of it, allowing it to be examined visually. 
This is especially advantageous when the material is not able to be broken down physically. 
Alcorn patented his “method for fabricating an imaging X-ray spectrometer” in 1984. He was cited for his method’s innovative use of the thermomigration of aluminum. For this achievement he was recognized with the NASA/GSFC (Goddard Space Flight Center) Inventor of the Year Award.
Gebisa Ejeta (born 1950) is an Ethiopian plant breeder, geneticist and Professor at Purdue University. In 2009, he won the World Food Prize for his major contributions in the production of sorghum.
During primary school, Ejeta planned to study engineering when he reached college age, but his mother convinced him he could do more working in agriculture. 
With aid from Oklahoma State University, he attended an agriculture and technical secondary school in Oromia-Ethiopia and also studied at what is now Haramaya University. 
The university and the US Agency for International Development helped him earn a doctorate from Purdue.
Working in Sudan during the early 1980s, Ejeta developed Africa’s first commercial hybrid variety of sorghum tolerant to drought. 
Later, with a Purdue University colleague in Indiana, he discovered the chemical basis of the relationship between the deadly parasitic weed striga and sorghum, and was able to produce sorghum varieties resistant to both drought and striga.
On 2011 President Barack Obama appointed Gebisa Ejeta as Member, Board for International Food and Agricultural Development
King Ibrahim Mbouombouo Njoya (1860–1933) was 17th in a long dynasty of kings that ruled over Bamum and its people in western Cameroon dating back to the 14th century. He succeeded his father Nsangu (hn-SAH-hn-goo), and ruled from 1886 or 1887 until his death in 1933, when he was succeeded by his son, Seidou Njimoluh Njoya. He ruled from the ancient walled city of Fumban.
Ibrahim Njoya is credited with developing the Bamum script, a syllabic system for writing in the Bamum language. 
Prior to his reign at the end of the 19th century, the long history of the Bamum people was preserved primarily through oral transmission from one generation to the next in the manner of the African Griot tradition.
Recognizing the inherent danger of important historical facts being omitted or corrupted, he set out to establish a means of written recording of Bamum history. When his work was completed, his alphabet, called, A-ka-u-ku, contained 73 signs.
Njoya is also credited with having invented a hand-powered mill for grinding corn.
His grandson, Ibrahim Mbombo Njoya, a present-day Sultan in Cameroon and the latest ruler in the Bamoun Dynasty, has established a school in the palace built by his grandfather, in which schoolchildren are once again learning the Bamum script developed by Ibrahim Njoya.  –  listverse.com/Wikipedia

Kenyon.edu

History of Black Education

In short, white universities felt no special mission, as centers of American culture, to incorporate the former American slaves into that culture.

-Allen Ballard, The Education of Black Folk

To better understand the status of blacks in education between the years 1950-1975, one must have an understanding of the historical events shaping that status. An understanding of social political status of Black Americans is needed.

Ever since the days of slavery, constraining black education was used as a method to quell black agency and fears of slave rebellions. This denial only intensified Black people's desire for education. After emancipation, black education was relegated to poorly funded segregated schools.

During this period, two leaders emerged with conflicting philosophies regarding Black education, W.E.B. DuBois and Booker T. Washington.     

Segregated school in the South

Segregated school in the South

History of Black Higher Education

In higher education, several Black institutions were formed under the auspices of the Freedman's Bureau and the American Missionary Association, to help create black clerics and provide a Christian education for the Black "heathens." 

Simultaneously, Southern black institutions, segregated schools that largely depended on white philanthropy to exist, focused on industrial education that would prepare blacks for subservient roles in society. These institutions were in most cases, academically inferior to white institutions. The first Black American student graduated from Bowdoin College in 1890. Black students did not begin to enter predominately white schools in significant numbers until the 1960s.

-Education of Blacks in Ohio

Although from the mid to the late 1800s, Ohio had more colleges that any other state in America, the acceptance and enrollment of black students was relatively small. With the notable exception of Oberlin College (1833), which was open to black students as early as 1835, only two years after it open, Ohio's campuses were overwhelming white institutions with scarce Black students representation. Like Kenyon, these schools. Perhaps the establishment of Wilberforce University (1856) in Southern Ohio may have contributed to this.

Education in the 1950s

Before the beginning of the large-scale entry of Black students into white universities in 1965-66, the academic world itself scarcely noticed Blacks.

-Allen Ballard, The Education of Black Folk

While some universities would require federal urging to open their enrollment to black students, these were primarily larger state universities. Many private colleges never explicitly forbade blacks, but practiced a de facto segregation. Before the black enrollment boom of the late 1960s, some schools, such as Kenyon, began to investigate the possibilities of recruiting qualified black students. There were sparse scatterings of solitary black students beginning to integrate all white campuses. Contributing factors included the Great Migration, the economic gains of World War II, military desegregation, and the Brown v. Board of education case. These all brought hope to black Americans regarding their children's education.

Education in the 1960s
The university fancied itself free of racism and imbued with the belief that it is the man, not the color, that counts. But self-perception is often fatally in conflict with the perception of others. The white American university, as viewed by Blacks, was white and racist.

-Allen Ballard, The Education of Black Folk

The 1960s was a time of great turmoil and social unrest in America and in the Black community. At this time, more blacks began to attend predominately white institutions at an increasing rate. 

Moreover, toward the end of the decade, more blacks were choosing to attend predominately white institutions than were choosing to attend historically black colleges and universities. 

Sociologist Jacqueline Fleming discovered that while black students chose white institutions because of better academic reputations, financial aid, and academic resources superior to those at black colleges, the presence of racism or an environment that is hostile impedes these benefits for blacks. Fleming's studies show that black students tend to perform better and exhibit more personal growth at historically black institutions.

Many believe that the assassination of Martin Luther King Jr. prompted not only an increase in campus black political activity, but also an increase in administrative responsiveness to black student demands. The demands of these activists typically included more black students, increased black faculty, and the establishment of black studies programs. Kenyon was no exception.